Its sequel, The Mill House Murders, had a lot to live up to.
The book takes place in the titular house, a construct by architect Seiji Nakamura. The house is situated in the middle of a valley, a place where time almost seems to have stopped. The only motion are the three waterwheels of the house that power it. Its master is Kiichi Fujinuma, who retreated to the house after being crippled and disfigured in a car accident. Besides him, there’s his much younger wife Yurie, who barely knows life outside of the house, and two servants. And the artwork. For you see, Kiichi’s father Issei was a brilliant painter, whose works could delight and move. Kiichi has bought all of them and keeps them in the house, only allowing a scant few people to view them once a year. And he doesn’t even show them his father’s rarest work, The Phantom Cluster, a painting that terrified its maker.
This September 1986, the normal guests have arrived: Mori, an art professor who discovered and encouraged Issei. Oishi, a greedy and unscrupulous art dealer who nonetheless handled Issei’s work. Mitamura, the surgeon who inherited the hospital where Kiichi’s life was saved. The three are here to gawk at the artwork and maybe haggle The Phantom Cluster out of Kiichi. But there’s an unexpected guest this year, a party crasher named Kiyoshi Shimada. He’s here because of the Nakamura connection; fascinated by the bloody history that seems to cling to his houses. And because, last year, there were two other guests. Shingo Masaki, a former disciple of Issei who was staying at the house for unknown reasons. His limbs were dumped into the furnace. And there was Tsunehito Furukawa, a Buddhist priest at the Fujinuma family’s temple. He vanished from the house one year ago and is the only suspect in Masaki’s murder. But he’s also an old friend of Shimada, who just can’t believe that he would do something like that…
Similar to Decagon, Mill House uses a dual-narrative structure. Half of the story is set on the fateful night in 1985, detailing the multiple deaths and art theft that happened under the blanket of a storm. The other half is narrated by the master of the house in 1986, as Shimada waltzes into this frozen-in-time house to poke and prod at the past. When I read the book, I felt like there wasn’t much meat on its bones, but I got more into it as it went on. Ayatsuji keeps the pace going on what could easily have been a very slow and draggy narrative, especially in the present one. Kiichi is being harassed by someone who wants him out of the house, which gives us something to chew on in the present. Shimada himself is pretty subdued. He gets a good bit early on where he uses one bit of evidence to decisively prove that a thought-accidental death was actually murder, but again, he doesn’t do much until the ending. The other characters aren’t super distinct either. You get your impression the moment they appear on the page, and they don’t waver from that. Oishi doesn’t show a hidden heart of gold, Mori doesn’t suddenly find a spine, etc. We get a little more going with our narrator, but that’s it.
Still, we read a book like this for the mystery. And it’s a good one! Most of the mystery is centered on the past narrative, and the two deaths that occurred a year ago. There’s also an impossible crime to contend with, as Furukawa vanished from an upstairs annex with two witnesses playing chess downstairs. The windows don’t open enough to leave through, and there are no other hiding places up there. The explanation is well-done; technically a small part of the narrative, but Ayatsuji ties it back into the main mystery very well. The ultimate solution to the book is great. The general consensus from other reviews I’ve read is that the solution is pretty obvious. And well, kinda. I knew what was going on because I’d seen some spoilers, but even with that knowledge, I couldn’t quite make it fit into the mystery, which speaks well of the complexity. There’s a lot going on here! I will say that I think Ayatsuji tips his hand near the end, but I see that as a final big clue, freely given to those who are still lost and confused.
I don’t know how many actual clues there are. There are some bits you look back on and go, “Oh,” but they tend to be one-off statements that are easily missed in the moment. Clues seem a little thin on the ground. Even when Shimada spells out how he solved everything, it’s less through evidence and more through actually thinking through what happened that fateful night a year ago. But I don’t mind it, and I doubt you will either. The shock moment is great, the climax of a well-thought-out mystery.
So, not the same trailblazer that Decagon was, but that’s unfair to Ayatsuji. Any author would be proud of this book, and he has better to come. Highly Recommended.
Other Reviews: Bad Player's Good Reviews, Puzzles, Riddles, and Murders, Ah, Sweet Mystery, CrossExaminingCrime, The Invisible Event, Beneath the Stains of Time, In Search of the Classic Mystery Novel, The Case Files of Ho-Ling, Stephen M. Pierce, Criminal Musings,





